All rights reserved.
Click the button at the left for insightful essays on truth by your
executive director at the ID Report at Access Research Network.  
Want to see hundreds of Ph.D. scientists who doubt Darwin?  Click on the image above to
see those who have signed in agreement to the following:






There is scientific dissent to Darwinism. It deserves to be heard.
A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism:
"We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural
selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the
evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged."
Proposing a New Lexicon for Understanding
Abstract
I propose a new term to help clarify issues in the
current intelligent design/evolution debate.  
Recognizing that many things observed in nature
appear to be designed and true design
necessarily requires intelligence, the question is
simply whether or not such observed things are
true, intelligent designs, or apparently-designed-
yet-actually-unintelligently-caused occurrences.  
Because there is no English word for “apparently-
designed-yet-actually-unintelligently-caused” with
respect to observed events and objects, I propose
the term adesign.  Adesign is the absence of
design.  Adesign leads to adesignism, which, like
its linguistic counterparts atheism and
agnosticism, is a belief system defined by what it
denies.  By creating a clear contrast between
design and adesign, the new terminology precisely
captures the heart of the origins inquiry:  nature
exhibits either some design requiring intelligence,
or all adesign requiring no intelligence.  There is
no other logical choice.
CLICK HERE TO READ FULL ARTICLE
Want YOUR views posted publicly on IDnet Ohio?  Post them first at IDnet
Ohio's Blog on Truth.
Insightful, engaging, and original opinions will be posted HERE.
More to Come!
Stay tuned.